Eta
ASSOCIATION: one nominal, one interval variable
A. Eta n: ungrouped data:
n2 = {[nj
(Ymj - Ym)2 ] } / {
Y2--
[(
Y)2 / N]}
Where: Y = score of interval variable
Ymj = mean for nominal category
Ym = mean for total sample
nj = number in a nominal category
N = total in sample
k = number of nominal categories
Example: Ungrouped data
Union income | Non-union income |
10 | 2 |
10 | 3 |
5 | 2 |
5 | 3 |
Q: What is the association between union membership and
income?
A:
Y=union (u) | Y2u | Y=non-union (nu) | Y2nu |
10 | 100 | 2 | 4 |
10 | 100 | 3 | 9 |
5 | 25 | 2 | 4 |
5 | 25 | 3 | 9 |
30 = Yu | 10 = Ynu | ||
nu= 4 | nnu= 4 |
nu = 4 ----nnu = 4
Yu = 30/4 = 7.50 -----Ynu = 10/4 = 2.50
Total Sample: Y = Yu + Ynu = 40
N = nu + nnu = 8
Y = Y/N = 40/8 = 5.0
Y2 = 276
---Union category -----non-union category
n2 ={[4(7.50 - 5.00)2 ] + [4 (2.50
- 5.00)2]}/{276 - [(40)2/8]}
n2 = .66
n = .66 = .31
Interpretation:
: Use scale "There is ______association between (variable 1) and (variable 2)."
Interpretation for n2: Convert
to a percent and include in the statement, "_____% of the
variance in (interval variable) can be explained by (nominal
variable)." or 1 - n2:
Convert to a percent and include in the statement, "_____%
of the variance in (interval variable) cannot be explained
by (nominal variable)."
Example: .31 = a moderately small association between income and union membership.
n2 = .66: "66% of variance in income can be explained by union membership."
1 - n2 = .34: "34% of
variance in income cannot be explained by union membership."
B. Eta--grouped data
n2 = {[nj(Ymj
- Ym)2 ]} / {
f(Y)2
-- [(
fY)2 / N]}
Where: f = frequency
Y = score of interval variable
Ymj = mean for nominal category
Ym = mean for total sample
nj = number in a nominal category
N = total in sample
k = number of nominal categories
Hint: Ym = fm/N;
Yj =
fm/nj
Example: grouped data
Income | Class '69 | Class '71 | Class '82 |
f | f | f | |
10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Q: What is the association between graduating class and
income?
A:
Income | Class '69 | Class '71 | Class '82 | |||
f | fm | f | fm | f | fm | |
10 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 25 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
3= n69 | 25 | 2= n71 | 13 | 5= n82 | 25 |
Ym69 = 25/3 = 8.33; Ym71 = 13/4 = 3.25;
Ym82 = 25/5 = 5.00
Total Sample:
Income | f | fm or Y | Y2 | fY2 |
10 | 2 | 20 | 100 | 200 |
5 | 7 | 35 | 25 | 175 |
4 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 16 |
2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
12 = N | 63 | 399 |
Ymtotal = fm/N = 63/12 = 5.25
n2 = [3(8.33 - 5.25)2] + [4(3.25 - 5.25)2] + [5(5.00 - 5.25)2 ]
399 - [(63)2 /12]
n2 = .66
n= .81
Interpret these the same as for Eta for ungrouped data.